Enterprise underlines Commission’s naked ambition

May 11, 2009 at 8:54 am 4 comments

I am sure this video shall spark debate, as I guess it is supposed to.

Alas the story would have been so different had Sarah passed the concours.

Is it me or is the idea of the Commission putting out a video (even a good one) to promote careers in the private sector ironic on so many levels?

James

Advertisements

Entry filed under: European Commission. Tags: , , , .

2009: A European Odyssey (into French online media) Welcome, The Lobby

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Julien Frisch  |  May 11, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Why is the Commission adorning itself with borrowed plumes, with the economic success of individuals? And why does it need to spend money on a campaign spot in this regard? And are only beautiful people able to have good business ideas?

    Reply
  • 2. Ralf Grahn  |  May 11, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    SME week obliges?

    But why do all the videos and ads from the EU institutions hae to be so weird?

    Have they run out of rational arguments?

    Reply
    • 3. fhbrussels  |  May 11, 2009 at 5:24 pm

      Ralf,

      Rational arguments don’t always win I’m afraid. My experience of public affairs in Brussels suggests that one fights on fact and often loses the argument on emotion in any public debate. Clearly the Commission and the EU has been doing just that – see UK press coverage or Irish referendum. It is necessary to have rational arguments, but often not sufficient.

      The Commission’s videos, either this one or the other Film Lovers Will Love This, are good in my view as they make Europe relevant to normal citizens (not me) in an entertaining way. How many Europeans would have known that the EU funds European cinema if the YouTube video with that message at the end would not have been viewed by circa 8 million people?

      A few thoughts on why these videos get so much attention in online and traditional media:

      – They seek to provide an emotional reaction in the audience. In this case they use sex, which as we know sells, in a creative way to get their message across. We are talking about it, so it apparently works. Yes they provoke debate about whether the Commission should be doing it, but I guess that’s part of the point.
      – They don’t go on at great lengths about policy. Unlike a lot of the infomercials on EUTube they are able to reach out beyond students who need a crash course in EU climate change policy and Brussels based actors. There are of course other more suitable communications tools available for more detailed rational argumentation. The all encompassing Europa.eu site for one.
      – They are dissonant with the Commission’s own image as a bureaucratic monolith. Who’d have thought that Commission officials have a laugh too?

      James

      Reply
  • 4. Ralf Grahn  |  May 11, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    James,

    They are still weird, but you make the case pretty well.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About this blog

A blog on politics, policy, public affairs and communications in Brussels and the European Union. The blog is written by the team at Fleishman-Hillard in Brussels. Views expressed are personal and do not reflect those of the company or its clients. You will find the contact details of our team at www.fleishman-hillard.eu

Subscribe to this blog

FH Brussels tweets

FH corporate reputation

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Archives


%d bloggers like this: